Semiotic Interaction
Core Principles
Interaction as Meaning
The fundamental axiom of the theory is that meaning and interaction are identical. This differs from traditional semiotic theories that treat meaning as emerging from or being carried by interactions. The theory posits that wherever there is interaction, there is meaning, and vice versa.
Domains of Interaction
Simple Systems
Simple systems (a rock, an axiomatic system operate with other objects in the distances of domain {0}, characterized by:
-
Immediate, point-like interactions (delta interaction)
-
No mediation or reaching beyond the immediate
-
Binary presence/absence of interaction
-
[NOTE] complicated systems are simple systems with lots of moving parts, a machine, an AI, an algorithm. ==== Complex Systems Complex systems operate in the distances of the domain (0,∞), characterized by:
-
Non-local interactions through cascading semiotic chains
-
Multiple constituent subsystems
-
Capacity for goal-directed behavior
Bidirectional Nature
Meaning-as-interaction occurs at all scales simultaneously, with no privileged level. This eliminates hierarchical layers - each part of a system can interact with any other part, creating a web of meaning through direct interaction.
Key Implications
Absence of Meaning
The absence of meaning between two entities implies no interaction between them. This provides a clean logical foundation: if A "means nothing" to B, then A and B do not interact in any way, directly or through cascading chains.
Formal Systems
Mathematical and other formal systems demonstrate meaning through consistent patterns of interaction. For example, Principia Mathematica represents a theorem-generating machine where meaning emerges from the consistent interaction of symbols according to axioms.
Force and Attention
In this framework, force is reframed as the capacity to segment concepts from the sensory milieu. It represents the ability to create distinction in perception through interaction patterns.
Applications
Goal-Directed Behavior
Complex systems exhibit goal-directed behavior through cascading chains of interaction. Each link in the chain maintains its immediate interaction while participating in the larger pattern, enabling non-local effects through local means.
Direct Experience
The framework treats direct experience not as an emergent property but as a pattern of interaction. This eliminates the need to bridge physical and experiential aspects, as they are different facets of the same interaction.
Significance
This theory provides a parsimonious framework for understanding meaning. It dissolves rather than solves traditional problems in semiotics and philosophy of mind by eliminating unnecessary conceptual layers.
References
Comments
Public conversation about this article.
No comments yet.
Article metadata
About this entry
Event Id
Raw event
Other authors
No one else has published this topic yet.